Critique of FCM and ICLEI Partners for Climate Protection Programs: Data Harvesting and Connections to International Green Energy Interests
The Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) and ICLEI's Partners for Climate Protection (PCP) program promote climate action at the local level across Canada. However, several concerns arise regarding data harvesting practices and the involvement of international third parties heavily invested in the green energy sector. These issues can lead to potential conflicts of interest, privacy concerns, and undue influence on municipal decision-making.
ICLEI Funding Sources
ICLEI (International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives) receives funding from various sources, including:
Membership Fees: Local governments pay fees to join ICLEI, accessing resources and support for sustainability initiatives.
Project Funding: ICLEI receives financial support from international organizations and foundations for specific sustainability and climate action projects.
Grants: Various governmental and non-governmental organizations provide grants to support ICLEI's mission.
Private Sector Partnerships: Collaborations with private companies provide additional funding for ICLEI projects.
International Organizations: Funding also comes from entities such as the United Nations and the European Union.
Example of Specific Funding: Google EIE Action Fund
The Google EIE Action Fund, a partnership between Google.org and ICLEI, exemplifies ICLEI’s funding from private sector partnerships. This fund aims to support data-driven environmental and climate action at the local level.
Article: Google and ICLEI Announce $4 Million Fund for Data-Driven Climate Action
Madrid, Spain (10 December 2019) – During COP25 in Madrid, Google and ICLEI announced a new $4 million fund to support European and Latin American non-profits and academic institutions leading data-driven climate action efforts at the local level. Google’s Environmental Insights Explorer (EIE) tool provides cities with data to measure greenhouse gas emissions and opportunities to reduce CO2 emissions. ICLEI will allocate the fund to projects that use this data to take climate action, supported by local governments' outreach to non-profits and academic organizations.
For more details, visit the ICLEI press release.
Major Financial Contributors to Alphabet Inc. (Google's Parent Company)
Individual Insiders:
Larry Page: Co-founder of Google and major shareholder.
Sergey Brin: Co-founder of Google and major shareholder.
Sundar Pichai: CEO of Alphabet Inc.
Top Institutional Shareholders:
Vanguard Group:
An investment management company, one of the largest in the world.
Owned by its funds' shareholders.
Key executives include Mortimer J. Buckley (CEO).
BlackRock (BLK):
The world’s largest asset manager, publicly traded.
Significant institutional shareholders include PNC Financial Services, Vanguard Group, and BlackRock’s own executives.
CEO Larry Fink and other top executives are notable figures.
Fidelity Management & Research (FMR):
A privately held investment firm.
Owned by the Johnson family, with Abigail Johnson serving as Chairman and CEO.
Oversees a wide range of mutual funds and investment services.
Critique of Data Harvesting and Green Energy Interests
Privacy and Data Security:
Municipalities participating in the PCP program share substantial amounts of local data, raising concerns about data storage, access, and usage. Ensuring data privacy and security is crucial to protect local interests.
There is a risk that sensitive information about local infrastructure and energy consumption could be misused if not properly safeguarded.
Transparency and Consent:
Full transparency is needed regarding data collection, usage, and access. Municipalities and citizens should be informed and give explicit consent before data is harvested, preventing potential misuse and building trust.
Conflict of Interest:
Many international third parties involved in these programs are heavily invested in the green energy sector and stand to benefit financially from municipalities adopting their technologies and products. This creates a potential conflict of interest as these companies may prioritize their commercial interests over local needs.
The involvement of these entities can lead to undue influence on municipal decision-making, pushing local governments to adopt certain technologies or solutions that may not be the most suitable or cost-effective for their specific context.
Pressure on Municipal Decision-Making:
The influence of powerful international corporations could pressure local governments to adopt certain technologies, potentially at the expense of more suitable or cost-effective local alternatives. Municipalities might feel compelled to align with these international agendas to secure funding, undermining local autonomy.
Sustainability and Appropriateness:
Green energy solutions pushed by international companies may not always align with the practical needs or economic realities of every municipality. Certain technologies might be less effective or more expensive in rural or remote areas.
There needs to be a balanced approach that considers local conditions and priorities, rather than a one-size-fits-all solution driven by external interests.
Recommendations for Municipalities
Enhanced Local Consultation:
Prioritize local consultation, ensuring community members have a say in environmental stewardship pland and so-called climate action plans. Engaging local experts and stakeholders can provide valuable insights and help identify the most appropriate measures.
Rigorous Data Governance:
Establish strict data governance policies to protect privacy and ensure security. Independent audits and oversight can maintain transparency and accountability in data management.
Independent Decision-Making:
Maintain independence in decision-making, avoiding undue influence from international corporations with vested interests. Thoroughly vet potential partners to mitigate conflicts of interest.
Focus on Practical Environmental Protection:
Emphasize practical, locally-relevant environmental protection measures over broad CO2 reduction targets. Pollution prevention, energy efficiency, and holistic local practices can often provide more immediate and tangible benefits.
Conclusion
While the FCM and ICLEI's PCP program are positioned as climate action initiatives, it is essential for municipalities to critically evaluate data harvesting practices and the involvement of international green energy interests. By prioritizing local consultation, ensuring data security, maintaining independent decision-making, and focusing on practical environmental protection, municipalities can better serve their communities while safeguarding against potential conflicts of interest. For further information on ICLEI’s funding, projects, and partnerships, detailed financial reports and project descriptions are available on their official website.
Invitation to Join and Share Important Information
We invite you to join the conversation about the impact of international sustainability programs on local governance and the importance of maintaining autonomy and transparency. The issues raised here regarding the FCM and ICLEI's Partners for Climate Protection programs, data harvesting practices, and the involvement of international green energy interests are critical for ensuring that local communities make informed and independent decisions.
Key Points to Consider:
Data Privacy and Security: Ensure local data is collected and used responsibly.
Conflict of Interest: Be aware of potential conflicts involving international green energy corporations.
Local Consultation: Prioritize community engagement and consultation in climate action plans.
Independent Decision-Making: Maintain autonomy in municipal decision-making to choose the most appropriate and cost-effective solutions for your community.
We encourage you to share this information with your local councils and community groups. By doing so, you can help ensure that local governments are fully informed and can take proactive steps to safeguard the interests of their communities.
References
ICLEI Funding Sources:
ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability. "Funding and Structure." Accessed July 2024. ICLEI Official Website.
Google EIE Action Fund:
ICLEI. "Google and ICLEI Announce $4 Million Fund for Data-Driven Climate Action." ICLEI Press Release, December 10, 2019. ICLEI Press Release.
Major Financial Contributors to Alphabet Inc.:
Investopedia. "Top 5 Google Shareholders (GOOG)." Accessed July 2024. Investopedia.
Alphabet Inc. SEC Filings. "Alphabet Inc. Annual Report 2023." Accessed July 2024. Alphabet SEC Filings.
Privacy and Data Security Concerns:
International Association of Privacy Professionals. "Data Privacy and Security Concerns in Smart Cities." Accessed July 2024. IAPP.
Conflict of Interest in Green Energy Investments:
Harvard Business Review. "When Sustainability Gets in the Way of Real Progress." Accessed July 2024. Harvard Business Review.
The Guardian. "The Green Energy Conundrum: Balancing Investments and Interests." Accessed July 2024. The Guardian.
Transparency and Consent in Data Collection:
The Brookings Institution. "The importance of transparency in data collection and use in smart cities." Accessed July 2024. Brookings.
Pressure on Municipal Decision-Making:
The New York Times. "How Corporations Influence Local Governments." Accessed July 2024. NYT.
Sustainability and Appropriateness of Green Energy Solutions:
Environmental Science & Technology. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Renewable Energy Technologies in Diverse Municipal Contexts." Accessed July 2024. ES&T.
Recommendations for Municipalities:
Canadian Privacy Law Blog. "Municipal Data Governance Policies." Accessed July 2024. Canadian Privacy Law Blog.
Local Government Association. "Community Engagement and Consultation Practices in Local Climate Action Plans." Accessed July 2024. LGA.
These references provide supporting information for the critique and recommendations outlined in this analysis of the FCM and ICLEI Partners for Climate Protection programs.
Join the KICLEI Movement! 🌍
Unlock the potential of localism and environmental stewardship with KICLEI. Explore our mission, get involved, and stay updated through our various platforms:
Join the KICLEI Network: https://www.kiclei.ca/join-us
KICLEI Website:
https://www.kiclei.ca/
BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/KICLEI
X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/kiclei_canada
Facebook KICLEI Canada Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/473641281948813
KICLEI | Substack:
Gather 2030 | Substack:
KICLEI Store: https://www.kiclei.ca/merch
Donate to KICLEI: https://www.kiclei.ca/checkout/donate?donatePageId=669be905cb2ace32c99cff53
Contact Us
For more information, collaboration, or to join our cause, reach out to us at:
Email: info@kiclei.ca | gather2030@gmail.com
Don't forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more updates on our efforts to protect local governance!
Share
To those of you in Edmonton paying attention. We have another proposal of federal intrusion into our municipality via our city councillors.
https://www.edmonton.ca/sites/default/files/public-files/National-Urban-Park-Pre-Feasibility-WWH-Report-June2023.pdf?cb=1722298749
Just a heads up. It appears they will do anything to give away their duty and our ssf sovereignty to cultural marxism any way they can.
It's all in the wording.
Interesting....also other funding of Agenda 2030 and 2050 sources in this Substack article...
https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/govs-using-tax-dollars-as-loans-to?isFreemail=false&post_id=136248614&publication_id=1865725&r=18xl84&triedRedirect=true